Why is FDNY trying to come up with a plan to inspect toxic building? Is it because FDNY lacked such a plan while Captain Pete Bosco was assigned to Engine 10
If you are already dressed to go to work, do you dress yourself again a second time? If I told you that a person is getting dressed to go to work, would only a complete and utter moron conclude that the person getting dressed is putting on his second suit and tie? We all get dressed twice in the morning, right, one layer on top of the other?
If you mapped out directions to your destination, do you map them out again? Isn't it fair to say that you map out directions to a destination because you need directions and you don't have directions?
If you figured out a solution to something and the solution works, do you figure it out again? Or do people seek a solution when their is a problem that has not yet been solved?
If FDNY already had a plan for inspecting toxic buildings, would FDNY be trying to figure out how to inspect toxic buildings again? Is there any evidence that FDNY is now trying to figure out how to inspect toxic buildings? Do you think Deep Throat has supplied FreePetey.com with such evidence? If the FDNY is now trying to come up with a plan to inspect toxic buildings, isn't this evidence that the fifteen day rule was inapplicable to toxic buildings (Click Here)? Is FDNY punishing three innocent fire officers for violating rules that did not exist while Captain Pete Bosco was assigned to Engine 10? Is it fair to punish anyone for violating a rule that did not exist?



Reader Comments