Let's "sideline" them for violating an FDNY protocol that did not exist before the August 18, 2007 fire: Chapter 2 or 'The Bastards Knew They Were Innocent
Chapter Two - The Bastards Knew They Were Innocent
On 9/10/2007, the top FDNY dalmation in Manhattan - He was not 'sidelined' by perfidious Nick - emails the New York State Department of Labor. The subject of the email is the same as the 9/7/2007 email from the New York State Department of Labor to him: "Respirator Usage at 130 Liberty Street". At the end of the email, Weinlein writes "We are also looking to develop a procedure to inspect these types of buildings. How would we need to decontaminate after the inspection." (See blue undelining above)
They knew! The bastards knew! They knew that FDNY did not have a procedure in place to inspect toxic buildings! They knew that Captain Bosco, his battalion and division chiefs are innocent. Captain Bosco his battalion and division chiefs could not have failed to follow FDNY procedure when such a procedure simply did not exist! FDNY was looking to develop a procedure it did not have.
Yet, the bastards "sidelined" them! It's unconscionable!
Do you know what the "sidelines" are?
The "sidelines" are a euphemism for the gallows. At a news conference, attended by perfidious Nick, with cameras flashing and politicians smiling, The City of New York marched three innocent men onto the gallows, blindfolded them, bound their hands behind their back and put ropes around their necks. And they have stood there to this day with nooses around their necks. Since August 27, 2007 - the day they were sent to the "sidelines" - three innocent men have stood with a rope around their neck not knowing whether or when the floor will open under their feet and they would swing in a most unhealthy and inhospitable manner.
How do you think it feels? From the perspective of perfidious Nick it must not be looked upon as such a big deal being taken out of "the game" and put on "the sidelines". His use of a sports metaphor confirms this. However, take a look at it from the perspective of the three men standing on the gallows with ropes around their necks day after day. Think of the anxiety these three innocent men have lived under since August 27, 2007: their comrades having made the supreme sacrifice and they, on the gallows, being cruelly blamed for it by perfidious Nick who as early as 9/10/2007 knew that FDNY did not have a procedure in place to inspect toxic buildings! Perfidious Nick who as "the father" of "his children" - the rank and file of FDNY - has not lifted a finger to remove the rope from their necks and has not even uttered a single consoling word to ease their anxiety. Instead, perfidious Nick abandons them on the gallows despite knowing that they are innocent.
Moreover, whose job in FDNY was it to come up with a procedure to inspect toxic buildings? Was it the job of the captain of the local firehouse who only arrived at ground zero in late December 2006 early January 2007? Captain Bosco was at the Ten House only about eight (8) months. What was FDNY doing over the 5 and a quarter years from 9/11/2001 when the ground zero buildings became toxic to when Captain Peter Bosco arrvied at the Ten House? From reading the email above, it seems that FDNY only started trying to figure out an inspection procedure for toxic buildings in September of 2007 and the job of coming up with a procedure to inspect toxic buildings was being done by the top FDNY dalmation in Manhattan not the captain of the local firehouse. Riddle me this Batberg: why didn't Scoppetta start work on developing a procedure for toxic building inspections when the ground zero buildings became toxic on 9/11/2001? What was his reason for waiting only September of 2007? Have you asked him?
The FDNY failure - and FREEPETEY has always maintained that the decontamination & deconstruction of 130 Liberty Street was not an FDNY project - was not that the Captain of the local fire house, his battalion chief and division chief did not implement an inspection procedure with regard to toxic buildings; the FDNY failure was that there was no inspection procedure to implement! Let's put the horse before the cart where it belongs. Had there been an inspection procedure to implement, the three innocent, diligent, dedicated fire officers would have implemented it. No question. It wasn't implemented because there was nothing to implement! It did not exist. It wasn't there. That there was nothing to implement is the responsibility of the very top of FDNY not the bottom. Don't look down at the scapegoats. If you want to figure out the FDNY failure, look up at those who made them into scapegoats. Up, up and up - that is where the responsibility lies.
SHAME ON YOU PERFIDIOUS NICK!.
It's unconscionable!
"These six things the Lord hates, yes, seven are an abomination to Him: a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift in running to evil, a false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord among brethren" (Proverbs 6:16-19).
* * * * * * * * * *
Go back to CHAPTER ONE - FDNY Seeks Help from PESH
[Your Name Here]
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend